1,1-Dichloropropene in Drinking Water
Found in 24 water systems • Detected
Updated September 2026 • Data from EWG & EPA
What is 1,1-Dichloropropene and Why Does It Matter?
# 1,1-Dichloropropene: Understanding This Uncommon Water Contaminant
1,1-Dichloropropene is a synthetic chemical used primarily as a soil fumigant in agriculture. Farmers spray it on fields before planting to kill harmful nematodes (tiny worms) and other pests in the soil. When applied, the chemical can leach downward through soil layers and eventually reach groundwater aquifers that supply drinking water wells. It's also used in some industrial processes, though agricultural use accounts for the majority of environmental releases. Once in groundwater, 1,1-dichloropropene moves slowly and can persist for years, making it a long-term concern in affected areas.
The chemical has been detected in 24 water systems across the United States, with an average concentration of 0.149 ppb (parts per billion) and a maximum of 0.5 ppb. While these levels are relatively low, the health effects of long-term exposure are still being studied. The EPA classifies 1,1-dichloropropene as a possible human carcinogen based on animal studies showing it can cause tumors in mice and rats. Limited human data exists, but animal studies suggest potential risks to the liver and kidneys with chronic exposure. Children may be more vulnerable to chemical exposures than adults, which is why many health organizations recommend extra caution with contaminants in drinking water used by families.
The EPA has set a maximum contaminant level (MCL) of 7 ppb for 1,1-dichloropropene, meaning water systems must take action if levels reach this threshold. The Environmental Working Group (EWG), which sets stricter health-based guidelines, recommends a limit of 0.00052 ppb based on cancer risk. This enormous gap—EWG's guideline is roughly 13,000 times lower than the EPA's legal limit—reflects how conservative EWG's approach is. The EPA's standard is based on balancing health protection with treatment feasibility and cost. None of the 24 detected systems currently exceed the EPA's legal limit, which is good news for those communities. However, the presence of this chemical in any amount suggests that agricultural practices in those regions warrant closer monitoring.
Alabama accounts for the majority of detections, with 15 of the 24 affected water systems located in the state. This concentration makes sense given Alabama's significant agricultural sector, particularly row crops like cotton and peanuts that rely heavily on soil fumigation. New York follows with 6 detections, likely tied to farming operations in rural areas of the state. South Carolina, Georgia, and Nebraska each have one detection. The pattern is clear: 1,1-dichloropropene appears in regions where intensive agricultural practices and groundwater-dependent drinking water systems overlap. Farmers in these areas typically have no alternatives to soil fumigation for controlling certain pests, creating an ongoing source of potential contamination.
Removing 1,1-dichloropropene from drinking water requires activated carbon filtration or reverse osmosis systems. Activated carbon, either as a pitcher filter or whole-home system, effectively absorbs the chemical and can reduce concentrations by 90% or more. Reverse osmosis is even more thorough, removing up to 99.9% of 1,1-dichloropropene and most other contaminants. If you live in Alabama or another affected region and your water comes from a private well, testing is important—many homeowners in agricultural areas don't realize their wells contain fumigant residues. Public water systems in affected areas should be treating for this contaminant if levels warrant it; you can check your water quality report or contact your local water utility directly. For families wanting additional protection, a point-of-use filter on your kitchen tap provides an affordable safety net while you investigate your water's specific contamination profile.
Regulatory Standards for 1,1-Dichloropropene
| Standard | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Average Detected Level | 0.15 ppb | Across all tested systems |
| Highest Detected Level | 0.50 ppb | Worst-case system |
Cities With the Highest 1,1-Dichloropropene Levels
| # | City | Detected Level | People Served |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Stamford, NY | 0.50 ppb | 44 |
| 2 | Ragland, AL | 0.50 ppb | 3,162 |
| 3 | Perry, NY | 0.25 ppb | 4,348 |
| 4 | Silver Springs, NY | 0.25 ppb | 60 |
| 5 | Castile, NY | 0.25 ppb | 440 |
| 6 | Perry, NY | 0.25 ppb | 150 |
| 7 | Childersburg, AL | 0.15 ppb | 9,744 |
| 8 | Glencoe, AL | 0.14 ppb | 6,450 |
| 9 | Gadsden, AL | 0.14 ppb | 1,065 |
| 10 | Ragland, AL | 0.12 ppb | 5,511 |
| 11 | Angelica, NY | 0.12 ppb | 950 |
| 12 | Leeds, AL | 0.12 ppb | 21,300 |
| 13 | Irondale, AL | 0.09 ppb | 10,098 |
| 14 | 205-681-1711, AL | 0.09 ppb | 2,616 |
| 15 | Oneonta, AL | 0.09 ppb | 19,737 |
States Most Affected by 1,1-Dichloropropene
How to Remove 1,1-Dichloropropene From Your Water
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing a wide range of contaminants from drinking water.
Echo RO System
Removes 1,1-Dichloropropene and 99.9% of other contaminants. The gold standard for drinking water purification.
View RO SystemsEcho Hydrogen Water Flask
Once your water is clean, supercharge it with molecular hydrogen for antioxidant benefits.
Shop Hydrogen FlaskFrequently Asked Questions
Is 1,1-Dichloropropene in my drinking water?
1,1-Dichloropropene was detected in 24 water systems across the US. Check your city's water quality report to see if it affects your water supply.
What are the health effects of 1,1-Dichloropropene in water?
1,1-Dichloropropene has been associated with various health concerns at elevated levels. The EWG has set health guidelines that are typically stricter than EPA legal limits.
Which city has the most 1,1-Dichloropropene in its water?
Based on our analysis, Stamford, NY has the highest detected levels of 1,1-Dichloropropene in its water supply.
How do I remove 1,1-Dichloropropene from my water?
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing this contaminant. Check the filtration recommendations section for specific guidance.
Related Contaminant Guides
Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Last updated: September 2026
Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.