Trichlorotrifluoroethane in Drinking Water: Complete Guide (2026)

By Echo Water Research Team 5 min read
Trichlorotrifluoroethane in Drinking Water: Complete Guide (2026)

Trichlorotrifluoroethane in Drinking Water

Found in 19 water systems • vocs

Updated September 2026 • Data from EWG & EPA

19
Water Systems Affected
0
Above EWG Guideline
834,911
People Affected

What is Trichlorotrifluoroethane and Why Does It Matter?

# Trichlorotrifluoroethane in Drinking Water: What You Need to Know

Trichlorotrifluoroethane, commonly known as CFC-11, is a synthetic chemical that was widely used as a refrigerant and propellant in aerosol sprays throughout the 20th century. Once released into the atmosphere, CFC-11 breaks down slowly and can persist in groundwater for decades. When these chemicals seep into aquifers or contaminate surface water sources, they can end up in municipal water supplies. The chemical is particularly persistent because it doesn't readily degrade in water—it simply stays there, sometimes for years. This makes it a "legacy contaminant," meaning we're still dealing with pollution from products banned or phased out long ago. CFC-11 production was largely halted in the U.S. in 1994 under the Montreal Protocol, an international treaty designed to protect the ozone layer. However, old refrigeration equipment, decommissioned industrial sites, and decades of atmospheric accumulation continue to introduce this chemical into water systems.

The health effects of CFC-11 exposure through drinking water are not fully understood at low concentrations. Animal studies suggest that high-dose exposure may affect the liver and kidneys, but human epidemiological data is limited. The EPA has not established a maximum contaminant level (MCL) for CFC-11 in drinking water, meaning there's no federal enforceable limit. This regulatory gap exists partly because CFC-11 is rarely found at levels that trigger immediate health concerns in most water systems. That said, the Environmental Working Group (EWG) takes a more precautionary approach and recommends minimizing exposure to any synthetic chemicals, even at low levels. The average concentration detected across affected water systems is 0.937 parts per billion (ppb), well below any known health threshold. However, one system tested as high as 8.76 ppb—still not at levels considered acutely dangerous, but high enough to warrant attention in a comprehensive water safety plan.

Currently, CFC-11 exists in a regulatory gray zone. The EPA monitors it as an unregulated contaminant through the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (UCMR), which means water utilities must test for it and report results, but they're not required to remove it. No enforceable federal standard exists. This is where the EWG's recommended health guideline becomes useful: it suggests keeping CFC-11 below 0.07 ppb based on cancer risk assessment and precautionary principles. Comparing the data, 19 water systems across the country have detected CFC-11, but none currently exceed the EWG guideline. This is good news, but it also highlights why monitoring matters—catching low-level contamination early prevents problems from escalating.

The geographic distribution of CFC-11 detection tells an important story. Wisconsin leads with 7 detected systems, followed by California and New York with 5 each. Utah and Minnesota each have 1 system with detectable levels. This pattern reflects older industrial activity, refrigeration infrastructure, and groundwater vulnerability in these regions. Wisconsin's prevalence may relate to historical manufacturing and the state's reliance on groundwater for drinking water—a combination that makes legacy contaminants more likely to surface. California's cases likely stem from both industrial history and the state's extensive groundwater pumping, which can mobilize older contaminants. These regions' cooler climates also meant higher historical use of refrigeration systems, increasing the likelihood of CFC-11 releases.

If your water utility has detected CFC-11, or if you live in one of the affected states and want extra assurance, activated carbon filtration and reverse osmosis systems both effectively remove CFC-11 from tap water. Activated carbon works by trapping the chemical molecules, while reverse osmosis forces water through a membrane that blocks synthetic chemicals. For homeowners concerned about CFC-11 and other legacy contaminants, an Echo Water whole-home carbon filter or point-of-use reverse osmosis system provides reliable protection. Check your local water quality report—it should list any detected contaminants. If CFC-11 appears, ask your utility about their removal plans. In the meantime, a quality home filtration system gives you control over what you and your family drink.

Regulatory Standards for Trichlorotrifluoroethane

Standard Level Notes
EWG Health Guideline 4,000 ppb Stricter, based on latest science
Average Detected Level 0.94 ppb Across all tested systems
Highest Detected Level 8.76 ppb Worst-case system

Cities With the Highest Trichlorotrifluoroethane Levels

# City Detected Level People Served
1 Magna, UT 8.76 ppb 32,100
2 San Bernardino, CA 5 ppb 109,608
3 Stevens Point, WI 1.20 ppb 24,551
4 Greenlawn, NY 0.70 ppb 42,000
5 Huntington, NY 0.51 ppb 34,522
6 Franklin Square, NY 0.43 ppb 20,000
7 Pauma Valley, CA 0.34 ppb 769
8 Austin, MN 0.33 ppb 59
9 Grafton, WI 0.30 ppb 11,745
10 San Jose, CA 0.11 ppb 108,902
11 Merrick, NY 0.06 ppb 177,000
12 Plainview, NY 0.01 ppb 35,000
13 Madison, WI 0.01 ppb 235,000
14 Fitchburg, WI 0.01 ppb 150
15 Madison, WI 0.01 ppb 1,670

Concerned about Trichlorotrifluoroethane?

Check if your water is affected with a free personalized report.

Check Your Water

How to Remove Trichlorotrifluoroethane From Your Water

CFC-113 is highly volatile and lipophilic, making it moderately removable by activated carbon in standard filters (50-75% removal). However, pitcher filters provide incomplete removal due to short contact time.

Standard pitcher filters and carbon block filters can provide some reduction of Trichlorotrifluoroethane, though effectiveness varies by brand and flow rate. For maximum protection, a certified RO system is recommended.

Activated carbon provides moderate removal; reverse osmosis or air stripping combined with GAC achieves >98% removal. Pitcher filters are marginally effective.

Echo RO System

Removes Trichlorotrifluoroethane and 99.9% of other contaminants. The gold standard for drinking water purification.

View RO Systems

Echo Hydrogen Water Flask

Once your water is clean, supercharge it with molecular hydrogen for antioxidant benefits.

Shop Hydrogen Flask

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Trichlorotrifluoroethane in my drinking water?

Trichlorotrifluoroethane was detected in 19 water systems across the US. Check your city's water quality report to see if it affects your water supply.

What are the health effects of Trichlorotrifluoroethane in water?

Trichlorotrifluoroethane has been associated with various health concerns at elevated levels. The EWG has set health guidelines that are typically stricter than EPA legal limits.

Which city has the most Trichlorotrifluoroethane in its water?

Based on our analysis, Magna, UT has the highest detected levels of Trichlorotrifluoroethane in its water supply.

How do I remove Trichlorotrifluoroethane from my water?

Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing this contaminant. Check the filtration recommendations section for specific guidance.

Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)

Last updated: September 2026

Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.

Share
Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.