25 Nevada Cities With the Worst Tap Water (2026)

By Echo Water Research Team 10 min read
25 Nevada Cities With the Worst Tap Water (2026)
25
Cities Analyzed
330
Total Contaminants Above Guidelines
2,518,622
People Affected

We analyzed tap water quality data for hundreds of cities in Nevada to identify the 25 with the most contaminants exceeding health guidelines. This ranking is based on 2026 data from the EPA and EWG databases.

While all public water systems must meet EPA legal limits, many health experts — including the Environmental Working Group — argue that these legal limits are outdated and don't reflect current scientific understanding of safe exposure levels. The cities below have the widest gap between what's in their water and what's considered safe by modern health standards.

Methodology: Cities are ranked by the number of contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines (descending), with ties broken by total contaminants detected. Data sourced from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database. Only cities with available EWG testing data are included.
1

Sun Valley, Nevada

Sun Valley Gid • 17,000 people served
18Above EWG Guidelines
43Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Arsenic*Bromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromochloromethane

Sun Valley has 18 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 43 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Sun Valley water report →
2

Elko, Nevada

City of Elko • 20,451 people served
18Above EWG Guidelines
41Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Elko has 18 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 41 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Elko water report →
3

Carson City, Nevada

Carson City Public Works • 59,000 people served
18Above EWG Guidelines
32Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acid

Carson City has 18 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 32 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Carson City water report →
4

Reno, Nevada

Truckee Meadows Water Authority • 442,000 people served
17Above EWG Guidelines
42Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)DibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Reno has 17 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 42 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Reno water report →
5

Las Vegas, Nevada

Las Vegas Valley Water District • 1,539,277 people served
17Above EWG Guidelines
32Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromate*BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)

Las Vegas has 17 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 32 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Las Vegas water report →

Is your city on this list?

Get a free personalized water quality report for your address.

Check Your Water
6

Fernley, Nevada

Fernley Public Works • 23,064 people served
17Above EWG Guidelines
28Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromochloroacetic acidBromodichloromethaneBromoformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acid

Fernley has 17 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 28 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Fernley water report →
7

Dayton, Nevada

Dayton Valley Water System • 15,830 people served
16Above EWG Guidelines
29Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Dayton has 16 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 29 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Dayton water report →
8

Boulder City, Nevada

Boulder City • 15,000 people served
16Above EWG Guidelines
28Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromate*BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)

Boulder City has 16 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 28 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Boulder City water report →
9

Henderson, Nevada

City of Henderson • 336,534 people served
15Above EWG Guidelines
28Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acid

Henderson has 15 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 28 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Henderson water report →
10

Nellis AFB, Nevada

Nellis Air Force Base • 1,002 people served
15Above EWG Guidelines
25Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromate*BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acid

Nellis AFB has 15 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 25 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Nellis AFB water report →
11

Carlin, Nevada

Carlin Utilities • 0 people served
14Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Carlin has 14 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 17 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Carlin water report →
12

Overton, Nevada

Moapa Valley Water District • 8,500 people served
13Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Overton has 13 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 17 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Overton water report →
13

Graeagle, Nevada

Conestoga Mobile Home Park • 120 people served
13Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Graeagle has 13 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Graeagle water report →
14

Mesquite, Nevada

Virgin Valley Water District • 26,000 people served
12Above EWG Guidelines
22Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicChloroformChromium (hexavalent)DibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA9)Nitrate

Mesquite has 12 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 22 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Mesquite water report →
15

Golconda, Nevada

Golconda Gid • 60 people served
12Above EWG Guidelines
16Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Golconda has 12 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 16 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Golconda water report →
16

Glenbrook, Nevada

Glenbrook Water Cooperative Inc. • 1,000 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromateBromodichloromethaneChloroformDibromoacetic acidDichloroacetic acid

Glenbrook has 11 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Glenbrook water report →
17

Stateline, Nevada

Kingsbury Gid • 0 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromateBromodichloromethaneChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Stateline has 11 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Stateline water report →
18

Jackpot, Nevada

Jackpot Water System • 1,240 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
13Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Jackpot has 11 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 13 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Jackpot water report →
19

Winnemucca, Nevada

Winnemucca, City of • 8,066 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromoformDibromoacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)NitrateNitrate and nitrite

Winnemucca has 10 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 17 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Winnemucca water report →
20

Incline Village, Nevada

Incline Village Gid • 0 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromateBromodichloromethaneChloroformDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Incline Village has 10 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Incline Village water report →
21

Mcgill, Nevada

Mcgill Water and Sewer District • 1,200 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
10Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)Nitrate

Mcgill has 10 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 10 detected — significantly above the national average. Multiple known carcinogens were found at levels of concern.

See full Mcgill water report →
22

Stagecoach, Nevada

Stagecoach Gid • 1,628 people served
9Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Stagecoach has 9 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 17 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Stagecoach water report →
23

Yerington, Nevada

Weed Heights Development • 340 people served
9Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)Nitrate

Yerington has 9 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Yerington water report →
24

Silver Springs, Nevada

Silver Springs Mutual Water Company • 0 people served
9Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)Nitrate

Silver Springs has 9 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Silver Springs water report →
25

Sparks, Nevada

Canyon Gid • 1,310 people served
9Above EWG Guidelines
10Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Sparks has 9 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 10 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Sparks water report →

What We Found: Key Patterns

The most frequently detected contaminants exceeding health guidelines across these cities are Dibromochloromethane, Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), Haloacetic acids (HAA5). These appear repeatedly across different water systems and regions.

Water quality varies significantly even within the same state, driven by local geology, agricultural activity, and industrial proximity.

Across all ranked cities, 330 contaminant readings exceed EWG health guidelines, but only 2 exceed EPA legal limits. This gap of 328 highlights how legal standards may not fully protect public health — EPA limits haven't been updated for many contaminants in decades.

Full Rankings Table

Rank City State Detected Above Guidelines Above Legal People Served
1 Sun Valley NV 43 18 0 17,000
2 Elko NV 41 18 0 20,451
3 Carson City NV 32 18 0 59,000
4 Reno NV 42 17 0 442,000
5 Las Vegas NV 32 17 0 1,539,277
6 Fernley NV 28 17 1 23,064
7 Dayton NV 29 16 0 15,830
8 Boulder City NV 28 16 0 15,000
9 Henderson NV 28 15 0 336,534
10 Nellis AFB NV 25 15 0 1,002
11 Carlin NV 17 14 0 0
12 Overton NV 17 13 0 8,500
13 Graeagle NV 15 13 0 120
14 Mesquite NV 22 12 0 26,000
15 Golconda NV 16 12 0 60
16 Glenbrook NV 15 11 0 1,000
17 Stateline NV 15 11 0 0
18 Jackpot NV 13 11 0 1,240
19 Winnemucca NV 17 10 0 8,066
20 Incline Village NV 11 10 0 0
21 Mcgill NV 10 10 0 1,200
22 Stagecoach NV 17 9 1 1,628
23 Yerington NV 15 9 0 340
24 Silver Springs NV 15 9 0 0
25 Sparks NV 10 9 0 1,310

Don't see your city?

Check your water quality now with a free personalized report.

Check Your Water

Frequently Asked Questions

What city has the worst tap water in Nevada?

Based on 2026 data, Sun Valley, NV has the most contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines among the cities we analyzed.

How are cities ranked in this report?

Cities are ranked by the number of contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines. These guidelines are typically stricter than EPA legal limits and reflect current scientific research on safe exposure levels.

Is my tap water safe if my city isn't on this list?

Not necessarily. Even cities not on this list may have contaminants of concern. We recommend checking your specific water quality using our free water scan tool.

What's the best water filter for contaminated water?

A reverse osmosis (RO) system is the most effective for removing the widest range of contaminants. For whole-home protection, a combination of RO for drinking water and a whole-home filter for showers and baths is recommended.

Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)

Last updated: April 2026

Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.

Share
Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.