Las Vegas, Nevada Tap Water Quality Report (2026)

By Echo Water Research Team 4 min read
Las Vegas, Nevada Tap Water Quality Report (2026)

Las Vegas, Nevada Tap Water Quality Report

Serving utility: Las Vegas Valley Water District

Updated March 2026 • Data from EWG Tap Water Database & EPA SDWIS

32
Contaminants Detected
17
Above EWG Guidelines
1,539,277
People Served

High Priority Concerns

Las Vegas tap water has 17 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines, including Haloacetic acids (HAA9), Arsenic, Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs). Additionally, 15 known or suspected carcinogens were detected, including Haloacetic acids (HAA9), Arsenic, Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs).

Water Provider Information

Provider
Las Vegas Valley Water District
Location
Las Vegas, NV
Population Served
1,539,277
Data Sources
EWG, EPA SDWIS
How does Las Vegas compare? See where it ranks in our Nevada state rankings and national report.

Contaminants Detected

Contaminant Detected Level EWG Guideline Legal Limit Status
Haloacetic acids (HAA9) carcinogen 43.20 ppb 0.06 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Arsenic carcinogen 1.80 ppb 0.00 ppb 10 ppb Above guideline
Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) carcinogen 49.40 ppb 0.15 ppb 80 ppb Above guideline
Bromodichloromethane carcinogen 15.30 ppb 0.06 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Haloacetic acids (HAA5) carcinogen 24.40 ppb 0.10 ppb 60 ppb Above guideline
Dibromochloromethane carcinogen 12.80 ppb 0.10 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Dibromoacetic acid 3.68 ppb 0.03 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Dichloroacetic acid carcinogen 14.30 ppb 0.20 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Trichloroacetic acid carcinogen 5.78 ppb 0.10 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Chloroform carcinogen 19 ppb 0.40 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Bromate* carcinogen 4.04 ppb 0.10 ppb 10 ppb Above guideline
Nitrate carcinogen 1.77 ppm 0.14 ppm 10 ppm Above guideline
Nitrate and nitrite carcinogen 1.77 ppm 0.14 ppm 10 ppm Above guideline
Chromium (hexavalent) carcinogen 0.20 ppb 0.02 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Bromoform carcinogen 2.43 ppb 0.50 ppb No legal limit Above guideline
Uranium carcinogen 1.38 pCi/L 0.43 pCi/L 20 pCi/L Above guideline
Radium, combined (-226 and -228) 0.11 pCi/L 0.05 pCi/L 5 pCi/L Above guideline
Aluminum 0.26 ppb 600 ppb No legal limit Below guideline
Barium 58.30 ppb 700 ppb 2,000 ppb Below guideline
Bromide 70.20 ppb N/A No legal limit Below guideline
Chlorate 79.50 ppb 210 ppb No legal limit Below guideline
Di(2-ethylhexyl) adipate 0.02 ppb 200 ppb 400 ppb Below guideline
Fluoride 0.48 ppm N/A 4 ppm Below guideline
Manganese 1.08 ppb 100 ppb No legal limit Below guideline
Molybdenum 0.73 ppb 40 ppb No legal limit Below guideline
Monobromoacetic acid 0.12 ppb 25 ppb No legal limit Below guideline
Monochloroacetic acid 0.59 ppb 53 ppb No legal limit Below guideline
Perchlorate* 0.82 ppb 1 ppb No legal limit Near guideline
Selenium 1.33 ppb 30 ppb 50 ppb Below guideline
Strontium 0.96 ppb 1,500 ppb No legal limit Below guideline
Testosterone 0.01 ppt N/A No legal limit Below guideline
Vanadium 0.37 ppb 21 ppb No legal limit Below guideline

Health Context

Haloacetic acids (HAA9) carcinogen

Exposure to elevated levels of this contaminant may pose health risks. See EWG and EPA guidelines for more information.

Arsenic carcinogen

Long-term exposure increases risk of skin cancer, bladder cancer, and lung cancer; chronic exposure causes neurological effects and cardiovascular disease.

skin cancerbladder cancerlung cancerliver cancerkidney disease

Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs) carcinogen

Exposure to elevated levels of this contaminant may pose health risks. See EWG and EPA guidelines for more information.

Bromodichloromethane carcinogen

Bromodichloromethane is a trihalomethane (THM) disinfection byproduct that damages liver and kidneys with chronic exposure. EPA classifies it as a probable human carcinogen based on animal carcinogenicity data.

liver cirrhosiskidney diseasehepatocellular carcinomabladder cancercolon cancer

Haloacetic acids (HAA5) carcinogen

Exposure to elevated levels of this contaminant may pose health risks. See EWG and EPA guidelines for more information.

Recommended Filtration for This Water

Echo RO System

Reverse osmosis filtration removes up to 99.9% of contaminants including heavy metals, PFAS, disinfection byproducts, and more. The gold standard for drinking water purification.

View RO Systems

Echo Whole-Home Filter

Filters water at every tap in your home. Reduces chlorine, VOCs, and disinfection byproducts from your shower, bath, and kitchen water.

View Whole-Home Filters

Echo Hydrogen Water Flask

Once your water is clean, supercharge it. Molecular hydrogen is the smallest, most bioavailable antioxidant — shown to reduce inflammation, boost energy, and support cellular health.

Shop Hydrogen Flask

Frequently Asked Questions

Is Las Vegas tap water safe to drink?

Las Vegas tap water meets EPA legal standards for drinking water. However, 17 contaminants exceed stricter EWG health guidelines, and 15 known carcinogens were detected. While legally compliant, additional filtration is recommended for optimal safety.

What contaminants are in Las Vegas water?

A total of 32 contaminants were detected in Las Vegas tap water, including Haloacetic acids (HAA9), Arsenic. Of these, 17 exceed EWG health guidelines.

What's the best water filter for Las Vegas?

For Las Vegas tap water, we recommend a reverse osmosis (RO) system for drinking water — it removes up to 99.9% of contaminants including heavy metals, PFAS, and disinfection byproducts. For shower and bath water, a whole-home filtration system reduces chlorine and volatile organics.

Where does Las Vegas get its water?

Las Vegas tap water is provided by Las Vegas Valley Water District, serving approximately 1,539,277 people. For detailed source water information, contact your local utility or visit the EPA's SDWIS database.

Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)

Last updated: March 2026

Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.

Share
Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.