Chlorate* in Drinking Water
Found in 2,374 water systems • Detected
Updated March 2026 • Data from EWG & EPA
What is Chlorate* and Why Does It Matter?
Chlorate is a chemical byproduct that forms when water utilities use chlorine-based disinfectants to kill bacteria and viruses. It also enters drinking water through the use of chlorine dioxide, a disinfectant increasingly popular with water treatment plants. Some chlorate comes from industrial sources, including the manufacturing of paper, textiles, and herbicides. Once it enters the water supply, it's colorless, odorless, and impossible to detect without laboratory testing.
Right now, chlorate shows up in 2,374 water systems across the United States. The average detected level is 157 parts per billion (ppb), but some systems have recorded levels as high as 1,244.5 ppb. That top number is roughly 8 times higher than the average. The Environmental Working Group (EWG) has set a health guideline of 210 ppb, and 579 of those systems — nearly 1 in 4 — are already delivering water above that threshold.
The health concern with chlorate centers on the thyroid gland. Chlorate interferes with the thyroid's ability to absorb iodine, which it needs to produce hormones that regulate metabolism, brain development, and growth. Children, pregnant women, and people with existing thyroid conditions face the greatest risk (EWG). At high exposure levels, research in animals has also linked chlorate to red blood cell damage, a condition called methemoglobinemia, which reduces the blood's ability to carry oxygen. The EPA has not yet set a legal limit for chlorate in drinking water, which means utilities aren't required to remove it or even report it as a violation when levels climb.
That regulatory gap is significant. The EPA has been studying chlorate for years but has not finalized a maximum contaminant level (MCL) — the legal ceiling for how much of a substance is allowed in tap water. Without an MCL, water utilities face no enforcement pressure to reduce chlorate levels, even when they exceed the EWG's health guideline. The EWG's guideline of 210 ppb is based on protecting the most vulnerable populations, particularly developing fetuses and infants. Until the EPA acts, monitoring and filtration remain the most reliable ways to protect your household.
Geographically, Texas leads the country with 315 affected systems, followed by North Carolina (206), Illinois (131), New York (114), and Iowa (107). Texas and North Carolina both have large agricultural sectors and heavily chlorinated municipal systems, two factors that drive chlorate formation. Illinois and Iowa sit in the Midwest's industrial corridor, where both municipal water treatment and industrial discharge contribute to contamination. New York's high number reflects the sheer size of its water infrastructure — more systems mean more opportunities for chlorate to accumulate. If you live in any of these states, checking your utility's annual water quality report (also called a Consumer Confidence Report) is a smart first step.
The good news is that chlorate is very treatable at the household level. Reverse osmosis (RO) filtration is the most effective method, removing up to 99 percent of chlorate from drinking water. Activated carbon filters alone are not sufficient — chlorate requires a membrane-based system to achieve meaningful reduction. Echo Water's reverse osmosis systems are designed specifically to handle disinfection byproducts like chlorate, along with dozens of other contaminants commonly found in tap water. If you're on a well or a smaller municipal system, testing your water first gives you a clear picture of what you're dealing with before investing in filtration. For families with young children or anyone managing a thyroid condition, addressing chlorate in your drinking water isn't something to put off.
Regulatory Standards for Chlorate*
| Standard | Level | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| EWG Health Guideline | 210 ppb | Stricter, based on latest science |
| Average Detected Level | 157.16 ppb | Across all tested systems |
| Highest Detected Level | 1,244.50 ppb | Worst-case system |
Cities With the Highest Chlorate* Levels
| # | City | Detected Level | People Served |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Middleton, MA | 1,244.50 ppb | 6,920 |
| 2 | Madill, OK | 1,161.60 ppb | 212 |
| 3 | Terrell, TX | 1,040.90 ppb | 3,534 |
| 4 | Kaufman, TX | 1,040.90 ppb | 3,174 |
| 5 | Elmo, TX | 1,040.90 ppb | 2,424 |
| 6 | Terrell, TX | 1,040.90 ppb | 849 |
| 7 | Seymour Johnson, NC | 1,007 ppb | 6,875 |
| 8 | Forney, TX | 989.60 ppb | 12,852 |
| 9 | Dallas, TX | 989.60 ppb | 11,268 |
| 10 | Elkhart, IL | 914.60 ppb | 375 |
| 11 | Charleston, IL | 914.60 ppb | 5,500 |
| 12 | Dallas, TX | 897.70 ppb | 5,613 |
| 13 | Dallas, TX | 827.50 ppb | 1,383 |
| 14 | Dallas, TX | 821.50 ppb | 150 |
| 15 | Frisco, TX | 817.30 ppb | 6,695 |
States Most Affected by Chlorate*
How to Remove Chlorate* From Your Water
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing a wide range of contaminants from drinking water.
Standard pitcher filters and carbon-only filters do not reliably remove Chlorate*. A reverse osmosis system with NSF/ANSI 58 certification is the most reliable solution.
Echo RO System
Removes Chlorate* and 99.9% of other contaminants. The gold standard for drinking water purification.
View RO SystemsEcho Hydrogen Water Flask
Once your water is clean, supercharge it with molecular hydrogen for antioxidant benefits.
Shop Hydrogen FlaskFrequently Asked Questions
Is Chlorate* in my drinking water?
Chlorate* was detected in 2374 water systems across the US. Check your city's water quality report to see if it affects your water supply.
What are the health effects of Chlorate* in water?
Chlorate* has been associated with various health concerns at elevated levels. The EWG has set health guidelines that are typically stricter than EPA legal limits.
Which city has the most Chlorate* in its water?
Based on our analysis, Middleton, MA has the highest detected levels of Chlorate* in its water supply.
How do I remove Chlorate* from my water?
Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are generally the most effective at removing this contaminant. Check the filtration recommendations section for specific guidance.
Related Contaminant Guides
Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)
Last updated: March 2026
Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.