25 Oregon Cities With the Worst Tap Water (2026)

By Echo Water Research Team 10 min read
25 Oregon Cities With the Worst Tap Water (2026)
25
Cities Analyzed
164
Total Contaminants Above Guidelines
1,606,587
People Affected

We analyzed tap water quality data for hundreds of cities in Oregon to identify the 25 with the most contaminants exceeding health guidelines. This ranking is based on 2026 data from the EPA and EWG databases.

While all public water systems must meet EPA legal limits, many health experts — including the Environmental Working Group — argue that these legal limits are outdated and don't reflect current scientific understanding of safe exposure levels. The cities below have the widest gap between what's in their water and what's considered safe by modern health standards.

Methodology: Cities are ranked by the number of contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines (descending), with ties broken by total contaminants detected. Data sourced from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database. Only cities with available EWG testing data are included.
1

Hermiston, Oregon

City of Hermiston • 19,696 people served
8Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitratePerfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)

Hermiston has 8 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 17 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Hermiston water report →
2

Cornelius, Oregon

City of Cornelius • 13,201 people served
8Above EWG Guidelines
16Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Radium, combined (-226 and -228)RadonTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Cornelius has 8 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 16 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Cornelius water report →
3

Klamath Falls, Oregon

Klamath Falls Water Department • 40,475 people served
8Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicChromium (hexavalent)NitrateNitrate and nitritePerfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)Perfluorooctane sulfonate (PFOS)

Klamath Falls has 8 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Klamath Falls water report →
4

Bend, Oregon

Bend Water Department • 77,704 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
20Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicChromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Bend has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 20 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Bend water report →
5

Keizer, Oregon

City of Keizer • 38,585 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicManganeseNitrate and nitritePerfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)Tetrachloroethylene (perchloroethylene)Chromium (hexavalent)

Keizer has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Keizer water report →

Is your city on this list?

Get a free personalized water quality report for your address.

Check Your Water
6

Wilsonville, Oregon

City of Wilsonville • 25,915 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
13Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromateChromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateNitrate and nitrite

Wilsonville has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 13 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Wilsonville water report →
7

Sherwood, Oregon

City of Sherwood • 19,885 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
13Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Bromate*Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Nitrate*Nitrate and nitrite*

Sherwood has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 13 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Sherwood water report →
8

Prineville, Oregon

Prineville, City of • 11,000 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
13Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicHaloacetic acids (HAA5)NitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Uranium

Prineville has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 13 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Prineville water report →
9

Pendleton, Oregon

City of Pendleton • 17,169 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
12Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitratePerfluorohexane sulfonate (PFHXS)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Pendleton has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 12 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Pendleton water report →
10

Tigard, Oregon

City of Tigard • 62,500 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Bromate*Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Tigard has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Tigard water report →
11

Lake Oswego, Oregon

Lake Oswego Municipal Water • 40,000 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromateChromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Chlorate

Lake Oswego has 7 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Lake Oswego water report →
12

Happy Valley, Oregon

Sunrise Water Authority • 50,003 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Happy Valley has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 17 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Happy Valley water report →
13

Portland, Oregon

Portland Water Bureau • 666,200 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicHaloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)ChlorateChromium (hexavalent)

Portland has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Portland water report →
14

Troutdale, Oregon

City of Troutdale • 16,185 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicHaloacetic acids (HAA9)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)NitrateNitrate and nitrite

Troutdale has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 15 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Troutdale water report →
15

Redmond, Oregon

Redmond Water Department • 37,566 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
14Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicChromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Redmond has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 14 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Redmond water report →
16

Beaverton, Oregon

Tualatin Valley Water District • 224,600 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
12Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)NitrateNitrate and nitrite

Beaverton has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 12 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Beaverton water report →
17

Ontario, Oregon

City of Ontario • 14,465 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
12Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Uranium

Ontario has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 12 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Ontario water report →
18

Hillsboro, Oregon

City of Hillsboro • 90,603 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Nitrate*Nitrate and nitrite*Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Hillsboro has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Hillsboro water report →
19

Springfield, Oregon

Springfield Utility Board • 62,100 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicChromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Springfield has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Springfield water report →
20

Milwaukie, Oregon

Oak Lodge Water District • 30,000 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Nitrate and nitrite*Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Nitrate*

Milwaukie has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Milwaukie water report →
21

Canby, Oregon

Canby Utility • 18,754 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Canby has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Canby water report →
22

St Helens, Oregon

City of St. Helens • 13,410 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

St Helens has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full St Helens water report →
23

Gladstone, Oregon

City of Gladstone • 12,121 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Chromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Nitrate and nitrite*Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Nitrate*

Gladstone has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 11 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Gladstone water report →
24

Coquille, Oregon

Coquille, City of • 3,953 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
9Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
CadmiumHaloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)NitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Coquille has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 9 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Coquille water report →
25

Antelope, Oregon

Young Life • 497 people served
6Above EWG Guidelines
9Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
ArsenicHaloacetic acids (HAA5)NitrateTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)UraniumNitrate and nitrite

Antelope has 6 contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines out of 9 total detected, placing it among the most concerning water supplies analyzed.

See full Antelope water report →

What We Found: Key Patterns

The most frequently detected contaminants exceeding health guidelines across these cities are Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), Haloacetic acids (HAA5), Haloacetic acids (HAA9). These appear repeatedly across different water systems and regions.

Water quality varies significantly even within the same state, driven by local geology, agricultural activity, and industrial proximity.

Across all ranked cities, 164 contaminant readings exceed EWG health guidelines, but only 1 exceed EPA legal limits. This gap of 163 highlights how legal standards may not fully protect public health — EPA limits haven't been updated for many contaminants in decades.

Full Rankings Table

Rank City State Detected Above Guidelines Above Legal People Served
1 Hermiston OR 17 8 0 19,696
2 Cornelius OR 16 8 0 13,201
3 Klamath Falls OR 15 8 0 40,475
4 Bend OR 20 7 0 77,704
5 Keizer OR 15 7 0 38,585
6 Wilsonville OR 13 7 0 25,915
7 Sherwood OR 13 7 0 19,885
8 Prineville OR 13 7 0 11,000
9 Pendleton OR 12 7 0 17,169
10 Tigard OR 11 7 0 62,500
11 Lake Oswego OR 11 7 0 40,000
12 Happy Valley OR 17 6 0 50,003
13 Portland OR 15 6 0 666,200
14 Troutdale OR 15 6 0 16,185
15 Redmond OR 14 6 0 37,566
16 Beaverton OR 12 6 0 224,600
17 Ontario OR 12 6 0 14,465
18 Hillsboro OR 11 6 0 90,603
19 Springfield OR 11 6 0 62,100
20 Milwaukie OR 11 6 0 30,000
21 Canby OR 11 6 0 18,754
22 St Helens OR 11 6 0 13,410
23 Gladstone OR 11 6 0 12,121
24 Coquille OR 9 6 0 3,953
25 Antelope OR 9 6 1 497

Don't see your city?

Check your water quality now with a free personalized report.

Check Your Water

Frequently Asked Questions

What city has the worst tap water in Oregon?

Based on 2026 data, Hermiston, OR has the most contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines among the cities we analyzed.

How are cities ranked in this report?

Cities are ranked by the number of contaminants exceeding EWG health guidelines. These guidelines are typically stricter than EPA legal limits and reflect current scientific research on safe exposure levels.

Is my tap water safe if my city isn't on this list?

Not necessarily. Even cities not on this list may have contaminants of concern. We recommend checking your specific water quality using our free water scan tool.

What's the best water filter for contaminated water?

A reverse osmosis (RO) system is the most effective for removing the widest range of contaminants. For whole-home protection, a combination of RO for drinking water and a whole-home filter for showers and baths is recommended.

Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)

Last updated: April 2026

Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.

Share
Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.