25 Cities With the Most Chromium-6 in Drinking Water (2026)

By Echo Water Research Team 9 min read
25 Cities With the Most Chromium-6 in Drinking Water (2026)
25
Cities Analyzed
228
Total Contaminants Above Guidelines
375,242
People Affected

We analyzed tap water quality data for hundreds of cities across the United States to identify those with the highest levels of chromium. This ranking is based on 2026 data from the EPA and EWG databases.

Chromium is a contaminant of growing concern in drinking water. The cities below have the highest detected levels based on the most recent testing data available.

Methodology: Cities are ranked by the detected level of chromium (descending), showing those with the highest concentrations first. Data sourced from the EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) and the Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database. Only cities with available EWG testing data are included.
1

Clairfield, Tennessee

Clearfork Utility District • 1,305 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
12Total Detected
2Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (total)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Clairfield has chromium detected at 431 ppb. 12 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Clairfield water report →
2

Prunedale, California

Holly Hills Mutual Water Company • 108 people served
16Above EWG Guidelines
23Total Detected
2Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethane*Bromoform*Cadmium*Chromium (total)Dibromoacetic acid

Prunedale has chromium detected at 105 ppb. 23 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Prunedale water report →
3

Pembroke, Massachusetts

Pembroke Water Division Dpw • 19,189 people served
16Above EWG Guidelines
30Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Pembroke has chromium detected at 98.60 ppb. 30 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Pembroke water report →
4

Newberry Springs, California

Ironwood Camp • 40 people served
12Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
2Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Newberry Springs has chromium detected at 85 ppb. 15 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Newberry Springs water report →
5

Carefree, Arizona

Carefree Water Company • 2,750 people served
9Above EWG Guidelines
12Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Carefree has chromium detected at 46 ppb. 12 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Carefree water report →

Is your city on this list?

Get a free personalized water quality report for your address.

Check Your Water
6

Dushore, Pennsylvania

Dushore Water Authority • 400 people served
8Above EWG Guidelines
11Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromochloromethaneNitrate

Dushore has chromium detected at 43.30 ppb. 11 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Dushore water report →
7

Westmorland, California

Westmorland, City Of • 2,202 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
17Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Westmorland has chromium detected at 42.50 ppb. 17 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Westmorland water report →
8

Morristown, Arizona

Morristown Water Company • 120 people served
5Above EWG Guidelines
7Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicNitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)Uranium

Morristown has chromium detected at 41 ppb. 7 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Morristown water report →
9

Pepperell, Vermont

Royal Pine Villa • 55 people served
1Above EWG Guidelines
4Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
Radium, combined (-226 and -228)Uranium

Pepperell has chromium detected at 40.50 ppb. 4 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Pepperell water report →
10

Imperial, California

City of Imperial • 21,347 people served
12Above EWG Guidelines
20Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorateChloroformDibromoacetic acid

Imperial has chromium detected at 40 ppb. 20 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Imperial water report →
11

Norman, Oklahoma

Norman • 100,939 people served
17Above EWG Guidelines
36Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromateBromodichloromethaneChloroformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acid

Norman has chromium detected at 39.30 ppb. 36 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Norman water report →
12

Wenden, Arizona

Wenden Domestic Water Improvement District • 360 people served
3Above EWG Guidelines
6Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicNitrateTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Wenden has chromium detected at 38 ppb. 6 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Wenden water report →
13

Heber, California

Heber Public Utility District • 6,979 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
19Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Heber has chromium detected at 34 ppb. 19 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Heber water report →
14

Dolan Springs, Arizona

Mount Tipton Water Company • 1,985 people served
3Above EWG Guidelines
7Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicNitrateNitrate and nitriteTotal trihalomethanes (TTHMs)

Dolan Springs has chromium detected at 33.30 ppb. 7 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Dolan Springs water report →
15

Yucca, Arizona

Yucca Water Association • 244 people served
3Above EWG Guidelines
6Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicNitrateNitrate and nitrite

Yucca has chromium detected at 33 ppb. 6 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Yucca water report →
16

Los Banos, California

City of Los Banos • 46,639 people served
13Above EWG Guidelines
23Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChromium (hexavalent)Dibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Los Banos has chromium detected at 32.90 ppb. 23 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Los Banos water report →
17

Holtville, California

Holtville, City Of • 6,355 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
16Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

Holtville has chromium detected at 32.50 ppb. 16 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Holtville water report →
18

Kerman, California

City of Kerman • 16,995 people served
7Above EWG Guidelines
15Total Detected
1Above Legal Limit
1,2,3-TrichloropropaneArsenicChromium (hexavalent)NitrateNitrate and nitriteUranium

Kerman has chromium detected at 31.70 ppb. 15 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Kerman water report →
19

Kingman, Arizona

Kingman Municipal Water • 45,000 people served
9Above EWG Guidelines
23Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
VanadiumArsenicChromium (hexavalent)Haloacetic acids (HAA5)Haloacetic acids (HAA9)Nitrate

Kingman has chromium detected at 31.60 ppb. 23 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Kingman water report →
20

Sun City, Arizona

Aguila Water Service • 962 people served
3Above EWG Guidelines
6Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicNitrateNitrate and nitrite

Sun City has chromium detected at 31 ppb. 6 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Sun City water report →
21

Clarendon, Arkansas

Clarendon Waterworks • 1,320 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
14Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
BromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acidHaloacetic acids (HAA5)

Clarendon has chromium detected at 30.80 ppb. 14 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Clarendon water report →
22

El Centro, California

City of El Centro • 44,158 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
24Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChloroformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethane

El Centro has chromium detected at 30 ppb. 24 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full El Centro water report →
23

Buckeye, Arizona

City of Buckeye Sonora - Sundance • 15,783 people served
10Above EWG Guidelines
18Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChromium (hexavalent)DibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA9)

Buckeye has chromium detected at 29 ppb. 18 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Buckeye water report →
24

Huttig, Arkansas

Huttig Waterworks • 0 people served
8Above EWG Guidelines
18Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformDibromoacetic acidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic acid

Huttig has chromium detected at 28.70 ppb. 18 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Huttig water report →
25

Surprise, Arizona

City of Surprise - Mountain Vista • 40,007 people served
11Above EWG Guidelines
25Total Detected
0Above Legal Limit
ArsenicBromodichloromethaneBromoformChromium (hexavalent)DibromochloromethaneHaloacetic acids (HAA9)

Surprise has chromium detected at 28.30 ppb. 25 total contaminants were found in the water supply.

See full Surprise water report →

What We Found: Key Patterns

The most frequently detected contaminants exceeding health guidelines across these cities are Arsenic, Total trihalomethanes (TTHMs), Bromodichloromethane. These appear repeatedly across different water systems and regions.

Geographically, the states most represented in this ranking are California (9), Arizona (9), Arkansas (2). Regional water sources, industrial activity, and agricultural runoff all contribute to local water quality variation.

Across all ranked cities, 228 contaminant readings exceed EWG health guidelines, but only 7 exceed EPA legal limits. This gap of 221 highlights how legal standards may not fully protect public health — EPA limits haven't been updated for many contaminants in decades.

Full Rankings Table

Rank City State Detected Above Guidelines Above Legal People Served
1 Clairfield TN 12 11 2 1,305
2 Prunedale CA 23 16 2 108
3 Pembroke MA 30 16 0 19,189
4 Newberry Springs CA 15 12 2 40
5 Carefree AZ 12 9 0 2,750
6 Dushore PA 11 8 0 400
7 Westmorland CA 17 10 0 2,202
8 Morristown AZ 7 5 0 120
9 Pepperell VT 4 1 0 55
10 Imperial CA 20 12 0 21,347
11 Norman OK 36 17 0 100,939
12 Wenden AZ 6 3 0 360
13 Heber CA 19 10 0 6,979
14 Dolan Springs AZ 7 3 0 1,985
15 Yucca AZ 6 3 0 244
16 Los Banos CA 23 13 0 46,639
17 Holtville CA 16 10 0 6,355
18 Kerman CA 15 7 1 16,995
19 Kingman AZ 23 9 0 45,000
20 Sun City AZ 6 3 0 962
21 Clarendon AR 14 10 0 1,320
22 El Centro CA 24 11 0 44,158
23 Buckeye AZ 18 10 0 15,783
24 Huttig AR 18 8 0 0
25 Surprise AZ 25 11 0 40,007

Don't see your city?

Check your water quality now with a free personalized report.

Check Your Water

Frequently Asked Questions

What cities have the highest levels of chromium?

Our analysis of 2026 data identified the cities with the highest detected levels of chromium. See the full ranking above.

Is chromium dangerous in drinking water?

Chromium has known health risks at elevated levels. The EWG sets health guidelines that are often stricter than EPA legal limits to account for the latest research on long-term exposure.

How do I remove chromium from my water?

Reverse osmosis (RO) systems are the most effective at removing a wide range of contaminants. Check the specific contaminant details for recommended filtration technology.

What is the EPA legal limit for chromium?

EPA legal limits vary by contaminant and may differ from EWG health guidelines. See individual city reports for specific legal limit comparisons.

Data sources: Environmental Working Group (EWG) Tap Water Database, U.S. EPA Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS)

Last updated: April 2026

Methodology: Contaminant levels are compared against both EPA legal limits (Maximum Contaminant Levels) and EWG health guidelines, which are often stricter and based on the latest scientific research.

Share
Leave a comment

This site is protected by hCaptcha and the hCaptcha Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.